The purpose of those Audemars Piguet replica watches is ego satisfaction

Like a tank.Richard also states The purpose of those Audemars Piguet replica watches is ego satisfaction, and if they do that, then fine, because that is their purpose.However, if that is their purpose, and their stated justification for their value is their apparent quality, they cannot quibble if watches of equal quality appear, and raise the issue of design., which is probably true for a lot of people.But that would make the statement a bit different, it is not the purpose of a Rolex Sea-Dweller, Submariner of GMT-Master to be labelled ego satisfaction’, it is the people who treat it like a status-symbol who USE it for their own ego satisfaction.

The watch is just a thing, no more, no less.The design issue is a whole different issue in my opinion.If you really think MarcelloC didn’t copy Rolex’s design, then I am done discussing I guess.I really wonder how someone can deny this.I had and have a few Mont Blanc replica watches, I also handled a few MarcelloC watches and ofcourse, they are of better quality then most Invicta watches, but surely not on par with Rolex.

Chuck Maddox, known for his great documentation and knowledge about chronograph watches, started his own blog at chuckmaddoxwatch.blogspot/.I suggest you take a peek there.Make sure to have read his interviews on this site, located here (part 1) and here (for part 2).About every chronograph owner who is active on the internet probably has Vacheron Constantin replica watches read an article he wrote or visit his website stuffed with horological links and articles.Today I am posting the first part of a conversation held with Chuck Maddox about watches, interests and his point of view on watchrelated subjects.You can find it here.Enjoy!